fbpx
null

I numeri raccontano la storia:

Stiamo notevolmente meglio insieme.

Dalla nostra prima idea pionieristica a decine di soluzioni per il continuum della cura, Equinoxe® è una storia di lavoro di squadra senza pari che guida l’innovazione, la ricerca e l’attenzione al cliente.

I dati oggettivi

Stai pianificando ma non navigando?

Pianificazione
preoperatoria

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder Preoperative planning app with ExactechGPS worrkflow planning software tool

Equinoxe® Planning App

Navigazione
in tempo reale

Exactech Real-time navigation with ExactechGPS Shoulder ApplicationReverse Cage Hole Navigation

ExactechGPS®

Un migliore
caso eseguito

  • Flessibilità intraoperatoria
  • Visibilità della volta glenoidea in tempo reale
  • Precisione migliorata1,12
  • Migliore fissazione13,14
  • Tempo neutrale dopo i casi iniziali15,16
  • Nessun costo di capitale
ExactechGPS Shoulder Application accuracy within 2mm of implant placement

chirurghi guidati entro 2 mm dal posizionamento dell’impianto e 2° di versione/inclinazione rispetto al loro piano1

ExactechGPS Shoulder Application is the first and onlyorthopaedic company to globally launch navigation for shoulder

azienda ortopedica per lanciare a livello globale la navigazione per la spalla

Le spalle Equinoxe sono navigate utilizzando ExactechGPS®

160+

ARTICOLI DI GIORNALE CON REVISIONE PARI

160+

ARTICOLI DI GIORNALE CON REVISIONE PARI

SITI CLINICI

PIÙ DI

1

PAZIENTI

78%

convertibilità
Stelo della piattaforma6

aTSA conserve di aumento del cuneo8

89%

più osso di una glenoide standard

51%

più osso di un disegno a gradini

Inversione

0.5%

instabilità5

@4Y

4X

riduzione delle linee radiotrasparenti della glenoide TSA
(gabbia contro tutto-poli)9

3X

MIGLIORAMENTO
nella rotazione esterna post-operatoria7

SOLUZIONI PER 100%

delle procedure di artroplastica della spalla, da semplici a impegnative

Exactech Equinoxe Stemless Shoulder
ENel mezzo
Exactech Equinoxe Humeral Reconstruction Prosthesis
0%

ANNUALE COMPOSTO

TASSO DI CRESCITA

2

PRINCIPALE

lanci di prodotti all’anno

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder was first to market with biomechanically designed humeral reconstruction system

°

AL MERCATO

con sistema di ricostruzione omerale progettato biomeccanicamente

15+Y

DI USO CLINICOE

Fin dall’inizio e
ancora innovando

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder was first to market with biomechanically designed humeral reconstruction system

PRIMO AL MERCATO

con sistema di ricostruzione omerale progettato biomeccanicamente

15+Y

DI USO CLINICO

Sin dall’inizio
e ancora innovando

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder System was first to offer reverse augments for glenoid correction

PRIMO

per offrire aumenti inversi

PRIMO

per offrire aumenti inversi

Exactech Equinoxe Shoulder System was first to offer reverse augments for glenoid correction

Cerchi maggiori informazioni o vuoi farti contattare da un Product Manager o un rappresentante di vendita?

Contattaci

Forza di Equinoxe in numeri Risorse

  1. Greene, A. et al. Navigated vs. non-navigated results of a CT based computer assisted shoulder arthroplasty system in 30 cadavers. Presented at ISTA 2018.*
  2. Simovitch, R. et al. Effect of tuberosity healing on clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty for 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 33(2), e39-e45. 2019.
  3. Mollon, B. et al. Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 26(7), 1253–1261. 2017.
  4. King, J. et al. How common are acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:627–634.
  5. Friedman, RJ. et al. Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Apr;26(4):662-668. 2017.
  6. Crosby, L. et al. Conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with and without humeral stem retention: the role of a convertible platform stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 3 maggio 2017;99(9):736-742.
  7. Friedman RJ. et al. Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Apr. 2017;26(4):662-668.
  8. Kersten, AD. et al. Posterior augmented glenoid designs preserve more bone in biconcave glenoids. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Lug. 2015;24(7):1135-41. AND Roche, C. et al. Biomechanical impact of posterior glenoid wear on anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Bulletin for the Hospital for Joint Diseases. 71(2):S5-11. 2013.
  9. Friedman, RJ. et al. Clinical and radiographic comparison of a hybrid cage glenoid to a cemented polyethylene glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Articolo in stampa. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2019) -, 1-9.
  10. Stroud, N. et al. Initial glenoid fixation using two different reverse shoulder designs with an equivalent center of rotation in a low-density and high-density bone substitute. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2013) 22, 1573-1579. AND Stroud, N. et al. Reverse shoulder glenoid loosening: an evaluation of the initial fixation associated with six different reverse shoulder designs. Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases 2013;71(Suppl 2):S12-7.*
  11. Simovitch, R. et al. Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2018) 27, 298–305.
  12. Nashikkar P., et al. Role of intraoperative navigation in the fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Set. 2019;28(9):1685-1691.
  13. Nashikkar P., et al. Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 25 luglio 2019. Articolo in stampa.
  14. Roche C., et al. Impact of screw length and screw quantity on rTSA glenoid fixation for two different sizes of glenoid baseplates. JSES Open Access (JSESOA-D-19-00048R1).*
  15. Greene A., et al. Clinical Use of a Computer Assisted Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System: An Analysis of 574 Cases. Presented at CAOS 2019.
  16. Greene A., et al. Clinical Use of a Computer Assisted Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System: An Analysis of 1702 Cases. Presented at CAOS 2019.

*I risultati dei test in vitro (banco) potrebbero non essere necessariamente indicativi delle prestazioni cliniche.

References for JSES April 2020 ads:
  1. Greene A. et al. Navigated vs. non-navigated results of a CT based computer assisted shoulder arthroplasty system in 30 cadavers. Presented at ISTA 2018.*
  2. Nashikkar P., et al. Role of intraoperative navigation in the fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Set. 2019;28(9):1685-1691.
  3. Nashikkar P., et al. Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 25 luglio 2019. Articolo in stampa.
  4. Roche C., et al. Impact of screw length and screw quantity on rTSA glenoid fixation for two different sizes of glenoid baseplates. JSES Open Access (JSESOA-D-19-00048R1).*
  5. Greene A., et al. Clinical Use of a Computer Assisted Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System: An Analysis of 574 Cases. Presented at CAOS 2019.
  6. Greene A., et al. Clinical Use of a Computer Assisted Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System: An Analysis of 1702 Cases. Presented at CAOS 2019.

*I risultati dei test in vitro (banco) potrebbero non essere necessariamente indicativi delle prestazioni cliniche.